'Only Simple Flag-Hoisting': Pak Cancels Republic Day Parade Amid Oil Crisis

Pakistan has cancelled its military parade and ceremonial events that were scheduled for March 23, the country's Republic Day. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's office announced on Tuesday.

The decision has been taken in the backdrop of a crisis that has been triggered due to disruptions in oil supply because of the ongoing war between the US-Israel and Iran.

"In light of the ongoing Gulf oil crisis and the austerity measures announced by the government, it has been decided that the Pakistan Day parade scheduled for March 23 and all associated ceremonies will not be held," the statement read.

The statement mentioned that instead of an elaborate celebration, there will be a simple flag-hoisting ceremony.

"All ministries, divisions and departments are directed to observe the occasion with simplicity and dignity, so that despite limited ceremonies, the importance of the day and its true message remain preserved," the statement added.

In March, Sharif announced sweeping austerity measures to combat a severe fuel crisis and economic instability triggered by the US-Israel-Iran war. These emergency steps aim to drastically reduce government expenditure and conserve energy as global oil prices surge.

Since the war began more than two weeks ago, Iran has attacked several ships in the Gulf, in effect closing the strait, a conduit for a fifth of the world's crude oil and liquefied natural gas, and driving up global energy prices.

Pakistan relies heavily on imported crude and refined fuels from Gulf producers, most of which come through the Strait of Hormuz.

Pakistan has raised the price of kerosene and Light Diesel Oil (LDO), local media reported on Monday.

Meanwhile, a report has highlighted that the sharp increase in fuel prices in Pakistan is turning painful during Ramadan, when household budgets are already under strain because the rise in the prices of basic necessities disproportionately affects middle-class families.

"The timing of the increase has, therefore, intensified public anger. Ramadan is traditionally a period when governments are expected to provide relief through targeted support for essential goods. Instead, households are confronting a cost shock that is quickly eroding purchasing power just as families begin planning for Eid expenses," the Dawn reported.

The day carries deep historical weight, commemorating the 1940 Lahore Resolution, the moment the All-India Muslim League officially called for an independent Muslim homeland, a demand that would ultimately culminate in the 1947 Partition of India. 

The date holds a second layer of significance as well, as it was on March 23, 1956, nearly a decade after the nation came into existence, that Pakistan transitioned into a republic upon ratifying its inaugural constitution.
 



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/MmV7Hei

String Of Exits In Assam Raises Poll Stakes For Congress, Priyanka Gandhi

The departure of Assam Congress leaders Bhupen Borah and now Pradyut Bordoloi, which has added to the challenges of the Congress ahead of the state election, has sparked an internal debate in the state unit on why the party's senior leaders could not prevent it. While many question the role of the state party chief, others question how such an event could transpire under the watch of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

Sources close to her have pointed out that the senior leader has been serving as the Chairperson of the Screening Committee and her role has been limited to the selection of candidates. 

Bordoloi, often called Shashi Tharoor of the northeast for his erudition, resigned from his Lok Sabha seat yesterday and is now set to contest the assembly elections on a BJP ticket. He is the last in a long line of leaders from Assam Congress who have made a beeline for the BJP since Himanta Biswa Sarma changed camp. 

Though Bordoloi has said his decision was the result of a slow estrangement and regular humiliations within the party and not so much about the election nomination, the perception that the latter is the key reason, persists. 

Read: Assam MP On Why He Decided To Quit Congress, Recalls Shashi Tharoor Incident

Bordoloi had quit, sources said, after the Congress decided to give a ticket to an MLA with alleged underworld links for the coming assembly election. The candidature is yet to be announced.

Lahorighat MLA Asif Mohammad Nazar was allegedly linked to Emdadul Islam, who, Bordoloi said, was involved in a murderous attack on him and other party leaders in April 2025. The man was charge-sheeted and once he was out on bail, was felicitated by Nazar. On multiple occasions Islam was seen in the presence of Gaurav Gogoi, Bordoloi has said. 

The MP said he had opposed Nazar's renomination during a screening committee meeting chaired by Priyanka Gandhi. But his reservations on the matter were rubbished at a committee meeting in New Delhi in presence of Gogoi, he claimed. 

Bordoloi had indicated that this last humiliation was the trigger for his decision -- which pointed to the screening committee - especially since he had written to the state Congress warning that he would resign if Nazar was re-nominated. 

Congress sources said Gandhi Vadra has executed her task as the chairperson of the Screening Committee competently. The names of most candidates have already been announced, including the decision to grant a ticket to Pradyut Bordoloi's son, though it is not known if he would accept.

Read: Pradyut Bordoloi, 'Shashi Tharoor Of Northeast', Quits Congress. What It Means

Calling Bordoloi's decision "unfortunate", Gaurav Gogoi asserted that the Congress had given him everything.

"Just two years ago, the Congress party offered him the opportunity to contest the Lok Sabha ticket from Nagaon. He is a sitting Member of Parliament; the people of Nagaon voted for him. And in this present election, the Congress party offered an opportunity to a member of his family to contest the Vidhan Sabha elections. If our current Nagaon Lok Sabha Member of Parliament wants Himanta Biswa Sarma to continue as the Chief Minister, well, that is his decision, which is rather unfortunate," Gogoi said.

In private conversations, Congress MPs have alluded to the role of the Enforcement Directorate and other government agencies in the matter. 

The state Congress now has a list of leaders whose departures they have to explain: Bhupen Borah's departure from the party on February 22, the defection of three MLAs from the Congress to the BJP on March 5, the switch of former Assam Congress Working President Rana Goswami to the BJP, the exit of former Assam Youth Congress President Ankita Das and Joint General Secretary Parba Das Kalita. 

The continuous and systematic departures, most leaders agree off the record, have progressively weakened the party. The current dispensation, though, maintains that the party, which currently has 29 MLAs in the 126-member House, will put up a strong fight in the election.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/xedfg9c

China, Pak Developing Nuclear Missiles That Put US Within Range: Intel Chief

US Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard, presenting the intelligence community's 2026 Annual Threat Assessment, said that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and Pakistan are the most significant nuclear threats to the United States. 

While testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gabbard said, "The intelligence community assesses that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and Pakistan have been researching and developing an array of novel, advanced, or traditional missile delivery systems, with nuclear and conventional payloads, that put our homeland within range."

Gabbard said that China and Russia are developing advanced delivery systems that are capable of penetrating or bypassing US missile defences. 

"North Korea's ICBMs can already reach US soil, and it is committed to expanding its nuclear arsenal," she added.

The intel chief highlighted that North Korea is deepening its ties with Russia and China, a shifting alignment she suggested carries serious implications for global security.

Speaking about Pakistan, she told lawmakers that the Islamic republic's long-range ballistic missile development potentially could include ICBMs with the range capable of striking the United States.

Gabbard identified Al-Qaeda and ISIS as significant and enduring threats to US interests abroad, with both groups maintaining a dangerous presence across parts of Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia.

She claimed that the expected number of missiles capable of striking the United States has increased sharply from 3,000 in 2025 to 16,000 in 2035.

Gabbard Contradicts Trump

On the situation in Iran, Gabbard contradicted US President Donald Trump and said that Iran made no effort to rebuild uranium enrichment after its capabilities were destroyed in a June 2025 US-Israeli attack.

"As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment programme was obliterated. There has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability," Gabbard said in prepared testimony to the Senate.

Ahead of the hearing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that Trump had full confidence in Gabbard.

Gabbard's testimony comes after former top aide Joseph Kent resigned as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center over the Iran war.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/mdBWC6O

SKY Apologised To NZ Star, Told Arshdeep This After T20 WC Final Clash

India's T20 skipper Suryakumar Yadav has revealed that he personally apologised to New Zealand's Daryl Mitchell after he was hit by an Arshdeep Singh throw during the recent World Cup final as he wanted to set an example of good leadership. Arshdeep was fined 15 per cent of his match fee and handed a demerit point by the ICC for throwing the ball that hit Mitchell on his pads. The pacer did not immediately apologise which prompted Mitchell to confront him, leading to an intervention by Suryakumar and the on-field umpires.

Arshdeep eventually issued a public apology and the two players shook hands at the end of the match that India won by 96 runs to retain the trophy.

Asked about the aggression on display in that moment during a podcast interview with PTI Videos, Suryakumar made light of the incident.

"Heat of the moment mein kabhi kabhi ho jaata hai (It happens in the heat of the moment sometimes). At that time you don't fully understand what is happening. But later, I told paaji, that this is not how it happens. He then spoke to Mitchell and it was a light moment," the skipper said.

"He took it in his stride. But it was very important for me to go and tell Daryl Mitchell myself, because as a leader, what example you set on the ground, that is also also very important.

"So I went and told him (Mitchell) the same thing, if Arshdeep did it deliberately, then I am sorry. And even if he did not do it deliberately, I am sorry," he revealed.

Arshdeep's public apology came soon after the match during a post-match interview with the broadcaster.

"Just want to apologise to Mitchell. My throw reverse-swung and hit him so just wanted to say sorry to him for that. It was not intentional," he had said. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/sj7AvBz

Israel Claims Killing Of Iran's Wartime 'Khamenei'. Who Was Ali Larijani?

Israel said Tuesday it had killed Iran security boss Ali Larjiani, a senior politician and Revolutionary Guards Corp veteran, and the country's de facto wartime chief following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei in a US-Israel air strike on his central Tehran compound.

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said Larijani had been "eliminated last night".

Iran has not confirmed this. But, if true, it will be the biggest blow to the country since Khamenei's death, and underlines the capacity of Israeli intelligence and American air superiority in this war.

Larijani, 67, has been described as a 'true insider', a trusted and loyal lieutenant of the former Ayatollah and adept at balancing ideology with pragmatism, the soldier-to-diplomat transition underlined by Khamenei sending him to Oman and Qatar to hold talks with the United States.

In August last year he was appointed as Secretary of Supreme National Security Council; this was in the aftermath of the 12-Day War, i.e., US-Israel air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

But Larijani's heft reached much further back; months earlier (and with some prescience) Khamenei entrusted him with drafting a strategy to survive decapitation strikes. The remit, senior IRGC officials told The New York Times, was 'to ensure the Islamic Republic survives not only American and Israeli bombs, but also any assassination attempt on its leadership'.

When death came for Khamenei, he executed the playbook.

After Khamenei, the rise

And Ali Larijani, already one of the regime's most powerful figures, became even more so, eclipsing the Ayatollah's successor – his son Mojtaba Khamenei – in visibility.

Hours into the war, with Tomahawk missiles and F-35 fighter jets hammering 'hidden' nuclear sites, IRGC bases, and capital Tehran, Larijani then appeared on national television.

The Americans and the Zionists had "burned the heart of the Iranian people", he said, "… and we will burn their hearts. They should know it's not like they can strike and leave…"

More statements and public appearances followed, Larijani's role as Iran's visible war leadership settling any nerves hit by the Ayatollah's death, even as his son shunned the spotlight. He was seen in public in Tehran for the annual Quds Day rally.

The wartime role

His position as the SNSC chief and IRGC military experience meant the bespectacled Larijani emerged as the focal point of war-time planning, coordinating ballistic missile deployments along the Gulf coast and overseeing the defence of nuclear sites as Defence Council head.

He was also seen as playing a critical role in the hours and days immediately after the Ayatollah's death, simultaneously delivering thunderous warnings to the US and Israelis while working behind the scenes to revive and operationalise the 'mosaic defence' network.

The survival playbook aside, Larijani remained the figure greenlighting missile strikes against American and Israeli military targets and civilian and oil infrastructure at Gulf neighbours.

And regional analysts told The New York Times Iran's chokehold on the Hormuz, a pressure point that has driven global energy supply to the brink of chaos, had been planned by Larijani.

There were even rumours Larijani vetoed the use of cluster munitions against Israel, though in angry statements released last week Tel Aviv claimed such bombs had, in fact, been fired.

Unnamed regime sources said Larijani felt cluster bombs were a red line for the US.

Domestically, Larijani had his eye on civilian protests – building on December-January agitations that caught Trump's eye in the build-up to this war – that could threaten regime continuity.

His attempts to quell the protests – in which thousands of people died, many executed by the regime – led to the US sanctioning him for "violently repressing the Iranian people".

Larijani's diplomatic avatar also fed into Iran's post-Khamenei leadership structure, setting him up as potential peace broker between the Americans and the regime. If nothing else Larijani was a key nuclear off-ramp, a familiar figure with mediators in Qatar and Oman and with the US.

Who was Ali Larijani?

Born in Iraq in 1957 to a prominent Shia cleric close to the Islamic Republic's founder Ayatollah Khomeini, Larijani's family has been influential within Iran's political system for decades.

He earned a doctorate in Western Philosophy from the University of Tehran and served with the IRGC during the Iran-Iraq war and as Speaker of the Parliament from 2008 to 2020.

In-between he also contested the 2005 presidential election, losing eventually to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with whom he later had disagreements over Iran's nuclear programme. Larijani, in fact, had supported the 2015 nuclear deal with the West from which Trump withdrew.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/eBPsAbU

Dhoni Had A 'Shisha Man' In His Hotel Room During IPL. Ex-CSK Star Reveals

Veteran England wicket-keeper batter Sam Billings, who used to play for Chennai Super Kings (CSK) in the Indian Premier League (IPL), has confirmed that legendary captain MS Dhoni would often indulge in shisha. Reflecting on his memories from the CSK dressing room between 2018 and 2019, Billings revealed that Dhoni would even appoint a "shisha man" to look after it. Describing Dhoni as a "cool" person, Billings also said that the former captain would usually keep his hotel room open.

"He (Dhoni) leaves his hotel room open, and he has this little "shisha man" in his entourage who looks after the shisha. His sole job is to look after the shisha. Khaleel," revealed Billings, speaking on the Stick to Cricket podcast.

This isn't the first instance of a player saying that Dhoni indulges in shisha. Earlier, former India cricketers Irfan Pathan and Manoj Tiwary had also hinted the same.

Billings also opened up on the stardom surrounding Dhoni, saying that the latter would rarely be able to leave the hotel.

In another fun anecdote, he revealed that Dhoni is a Manchester United fan, and the two would often watch football matches together.

"What a lovely guy, considering how much stardom he has. He's a superstar. Obviously, a Manchester United fan, like myself. We've watched quite a few games together because he can't leave the hotel or go downstairs to the bar," Billings said.

"I think just in terms of his captaincy, his aura, it's fantastic. He's incredibly calm and genuinely cool. There aren't many cool people. You don't meet many cool people these days. But he is," the Englishman added.

Billings and Dhoni played together at CSK in 2018 and 2019. CSK won the title under Dhoni's captaincy in 2018 and then reached the final the following year.

Despite being 44 years old, Dhoni will be entering his 17th IPL season with CSK in 2026. He even led the franchise in the second half of IPL 2025 after an injury to regular captain Ruturaj Gaikwad.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/LJ7zuHs

Induction Cooking vs Infrared: What Is Similar, What Is Different

If you have been thinking about adding an electric cooktop to your kitchen, you have probably already run into the induction versus infrared question. Both sit behind a flat glass surface, both run on electricity, and both look almost identical on a kitchen counter. But they work in completely different ways, and for Indian cooking specifically (everything from a high-heat tadka to a slow-cooked dal, a deep-fry in a kadhai to a Phulka on a tawa), the differences matter a lot more than they would for a kitchen that mostly does pasta and scrambled eggs. Here is a proper breakdown of what each cooktop actually does, how it handles the demands of Indian cooking, and which one makes more sense for your home.

How They Work: The Fundamental Difference

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

This is the part most people skip, but it explains everything else.

An induction cooktop does not generate heat in the cooktop surface itself. Instead, it uses electromagnetic energy to generate heat directly inside the base of the cookware. There is a copper coil beneath the glass surface that creates a magnetic field, and when a pot or pan with a magnetic (ferrous) base is placed on it, that magnetic field induces an electrical current in the metal, which produces heat. The cooktop surface itself stays largely cool. It only warms up from the residual heat transferred back from the hot pan. This is why induction is so energy-efficient: almost none of the energy is wasted heating air or the surrounding surface.

An infrared cooktop, on the other hand, works by heating the glass surface itself using a halogen lamp or a heating element underneath it, which then radiates heat upward into whatever vessel you place on top. It is closer in principle to a traditional electric coil stove, except that the heat is delivered more evenly and more efficiently. The surface gets hot, the vessel placed on it gets hot, and the food cooks. Simple and familiar.

The practical implication of this difference is enormous: induction only works with magnetic cookware, while infrared works with virtually any cookware that has a flat bottom.

The Cookware Question: The Biggest Practical Difference For Indian Kitchens

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Photo Credit: Pexels

This is where most people make their buying decision, and it is the right place to focus.

For induction, the rule is firm: the vessel must have a magnetic base. The easiest test is a simple fridge magnet. Hold it to the bottom of your pan. If it sticks firmly, the vessel will work on induction. If it does not stick, it will not work at all. Induction-compatible materials include cast iron, carbon steel, enamelled iron, and stainless steel with a magnetic base. Most stainless steel pressure cookers and many newer stainless steel tawas and kadahis are induction-compatible.

What does not work on induction: plain aluminium, copper, glass, ceramic, and non-magnetic stainless steel. And here is the problem. The Indian kitchen is full of aluminium. The classic thin aluminium pressure cooker, the aluminium vessels that have been in the family for decades, the lightweight aluminium kadhai. None of these will work on an induction stove unless they have been specifically fitted with an induction-compatible base. For many households, switching to induction means buying a significant amount of new cookware, which adds to the upfront cost.

Infrared is considerably more forgiving. Because it heats the surface and the vessel receives that heat by contact, it can work with aluminium, glass, ceramic, and most flat-bottomed vessels. There is no magnetic requirement. If you have a wide range of existing cookware that you would like to continue using, infrared does not force your hand.

There is, however, one shared limitation that catches many Indian cooks off guard: both induction and infrared work best with flat-bottomed vessels. The traditional kadhai with its rounded base is genuinely problematic on both. On induction, a rounded-base kadhai will not be detected by the cooktop's sensor and the hob simply will not activate. On infrared, it will heat, but unevenly, because the curved base does not sit flush against the glass surface. For everyday deep-frying, the solution is the same on both platforms: use a heavy flat-bottom kadhai, or a wok-style vessel with a flat base.

Cooking Performance: Speed, Heat Control, And Indian Techniques

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Speed and heat-up time: Induction heats up significantly faster than infrared because it generates heat directly in the cookware rather than heating through an intermediate surface. For tasks like bringing a pressure cooker up to full pressure, boiling water for rice, or getting oil to the right temperature for a tadka, induction is noticeably quicker.

Temperature control: Induction offers much finer temperature control. The electromagnetic field can be adjusted almost instantaneously, so dropping from a high sauté to a low simmer happens immediately and accurately. This is a real advantage for Indian cooking, where the difference between a perfectly done bhuna masala and a burnt one can be a matter of seconds. Infrared responds more slowly and retains heat in the surface for some time after the setting is reduced, which can make precise control harder.

Even heating: Infrared has a slight edge here. Because it heats the entire base of the vessel through radiant contact, the heat distribution tends to be more even across the bottom of the pan. Induction heats the centre of the base more intensely, which can occasionally create hot spots in certain types of cookware.

The tadka question: Both handle a quick tadka well enough, though induction's faster heat-up time and finer control give it an advantage when you need the oil to hit a specific temperature quickly, or need to drop the heat immediately after the mustard seeds splutter.

Phulkas and rotis: Neither platform replicates the direct flame of a gas stove, which is what allows a phulka to puff up fully. On both induction and infrared, rotis can be made on a tawa and will cook well, but the final puffing stage (where you would normally move the roti directly onto the flame) requires a workaround. A thick iron or steel tawa, pressed down gently on the roti, can help. Some cooks use a small wire mesh rack placed on the heating zone for the final puff. It takes some practice, but it is doable.

Baingan bharta and smoky dishes: This is the one technique that neither an electric cooktop can replicate. The smoky, charred flavour of a brinjal roasted over a gas flame is essentially impossible to achieve on induction or infrared. If baingan bharta is a weekly staple in your home, you will either need to finish on an oven grill, use an air fryer, or use the dhungar technique (placing a small piece of burning charcoal in the finished dish under a cover) to add smokiness.

Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Cost Considerations

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Photo Credit: Pexels

Induction cooktops excel in energy efficiency, transferring up to 90% of generated energy directly into cookware, minimising ambient heat waste. In contrast, infrared cooktops, while more efficient than traditional electric coil stoves, still lose energy to the heated glass surface and surrounding area. Over time, these energy savings can significantly reduce electricity bills. 

Safety is another area where induction shines, especially in households with young children or elderly members. The cooktop surface remains cool, reducing the risk of burns, unlike infrared surfaces that stay hot even after being turned off. Induction cooktops often include safety features such as child locks, auto shut-off, and overheat protection. Both induction and infrared are safer than gas stoves, which pose risks of gas leaks, carbon monoxide, and open flames. 

Regarding cost, infrared cooktops are generally more affordable upfront, with entry-level models in India starting at ₹1,500 to ₹2,500, compared to induction models starting at ₹2,000 to ₹3,500. However, if switching to induction requires purchasing new cookware, the initial cost increases. Despite this, induction's long-term energy efficiency can offset the higher upfront expense, with potential monthly electricity savings accumulating over a year or two, making it a cost-effective choice for daily family cooking.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose induction if you do most of your cooking in stainless steel or cast iron, you have or are willing to invest in induction-compatible cookware, you prioritise speed and precise temperature control, and safety is a priority in your household.

Choose infrared if you have a wide range of existing cookware that you would like to keep using (including aluminium), you are on a tighter budget, or you prefer a simpler, more familiar cooking experience that does not require checking whether your vessels are compatible.

There is no universally correct answer here, and that is actually reassuring. Both options are genuine improvements over older electric alternatives, and either will serve an Indian kitchen well once you understand the requirements. The honest truth is that most experienced Indian home cooks who have made the switch to induction end up preferring it after the initial adjustment period, largely because of the speed and the fine control. But infrared remains a practical, flexible choice, particularly for kitchens that run on a diverse mix of cookware accumulated over years of cooking. Know your own kitchen before you decide.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/s7lSPcO

'Only Simple Flag-Hoisting': Pak Cancels Republic Day Parade Amid Oil Crisis

Pakistan has cancelled its military parade and ceremonial events that were scheduled for March 23, the country's Republic Day. Pakistani...

Popular Posts

'Only Simple Flag-Hoisting': Pak Cancels Republic Day Parade Amid Oil Crisis

Pakistan has cancelled its military parade and ceremonial events that were scheduled for March 23, the country's Republic Day. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's office announced on Tuesday.

The decision has been taken in the backdrop of a crisis that has been triggered due to disruptions in oil supply because of the ongoing war between the US-Israel and Iran.

"In light of the ongoing Gulf oil crisis and the austerity measures announced by the government, it has been decided that the Pakistan Day parade scheduled for March 23 and all associated ceremonies will not be held," the statement read.

The statement mentioned that instead of an elaborate celebration, there will be a simple flag-hoisting ceremony.

"All ministries, divisions and departments are directed to observe the occasion with simplicity and dignity, so that despite limited ceremonies, the importance of the day and its true message remain preserved," the statement added.

In March, Sharif announced sweeping austerity measures to combat a severe fuel crisis and economic instability triggered by the US-Israel-Iran war. These emergency steps aim to drastically reduce government expenditure and conserve energy as global oil prices surge.

Since the war began more than two weeks ago, Iran has attacked several ships in the Gulf, in effect closing the strait, a conduit for a fifth of the world's crude oil and liquefied natural gas, and driving up global energy prices.

Pakistan relies heavily on imported crude and refined fuels from Gulf producers, most of which come through the Strait of Hormuz.

Pakistan has raised the price of kerosene and Light Diesel Oil (LDO), local media reported on Monday.

Meanwhile, a report has highlighted that the sharp increase in fuel prices in Pakistan is turning painful during Ramadan, when household budgets are already under strain because the rise in the prices of basic necessities disproportionately affects middle-class families.

"The timing of the increase has, therefore, intensified public anger. Ramadan is traditionally a period when governments are expected to provide relief through targeted support for essential goods. Instead, households are confronting a cost shock that is quickly eroding purchasing power just as families begin planning for Eid expenses," the Dawn reported.

The day carries deep historical weight, commemorating the 1940 Lahore Resolution, the moment the All-India Muslim League officially called for an independent Muslim homeland, a demand that would ultimately culminate in the 1947 Partition of India. 

The date holds a second layer of significance as well, as it was on March 23, 1956, nearly a decade after the nation came into existence, that Pakistan transitioned into a republic upon ratifying its inaugural constitution.
 



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/MmV7Hei

String Of Exits In Assam Raises Poll Stakes For Congress, Priyanka Gandhi

The departure of Assam Congress leaders Bhupen Borah and now Pradyut Bordoloi, which has added to the challenges of the Congress ahead of the state election, has sparked an internal debate in the state unit on why the party's senior leaders could not prevent it. While many question the role of the state party chief, others question how such an event could transpire under the watch of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

Sources close to her have pointed out that the senior leader has been serving as the Chairperson of the Screening Committee and her role has been limited to the selection of candidates. 

Bordoloi, often called Shashi Tharoor of the northeast for his erudition, resigned from his Lok Sabha seat yesterday and is now set to contest the assembly elections on a BJP ticket. He is the last in a long line of leaders from Assam Congress who have made a beeline for the BJP since Himanta Biswa Sarma changed camp. 

Though Bordoloi has said his decision was the result of a slow estrangement and regular humiliations within the party and not so much about the election nomination, the perception that the latter is the key reason, persists. 

Read: Assam MP On Why He Decided To Quit Congress, Recalls Shashi Tharoor Incident

Bordoloi had quit, sources said, after the Congress decided to give a ticket to an MLA with alleged underworld links for the coming assembly election. The candidature is yet to be announced.

Lahorighat MLA Asif Mohammad Nazar was allegedly linked to Emdadul Islam, who, Bordoloi said, was involved in a murderous attack on him and other party leaders in April 2025. The man was charge-sheeted and once he was out on bail, was felicitated by Nazar. On multiple occasions Islam was seen in the presence of Gaurav Gogoi, Bordoloi has said. 

The MP said he had opposed Nazar's renomination during a screening committee meeting chaired by Priyanka Gandhi. But his reservations on the matter were rubbished at a committee meeting in New Delhi in presence of Gogoi, he claimed. 

Bordoloi had indicated that this last humiliation was the trigger for his decision -- which pointed to the screening committee - especially since he had written to the state Congress warning that he would resign if Nazar was re-nominated. 

Congress sources said Gandhi Vadra has executed her task as the chairperson of the Screening Committee competently. The names of most candidates have already been announced, including the decision to grant a ticket to Pradyut Bordoloi's son, though it is not known if he would accept.

Read: Pradyut Bordoloi, 'Shashi Tharoor Of Northeast', Quits Congress. What It Means

Calling Bordoloi's decision "unfortunate", Gaurav Gogoi asserted that the Congress had given him everything.

"Just two years ago, the Congress party offered him the opportunity to contest the Lok Sabha ticket from Nagaon. He is a sitting Member of Parliament; the people of Nagaon voted for him. And in this present election, the Congress party offered an opportunity to a member of his family to contest the Vidhan Sabha elections. If our current Nagaon Lok Sabha Member of Parliament wants Himanta Biswa Sarma to continue as the Chief Minister, well, that is his decision, which is rather unfortunate," Gogoi said.

In private conversations, Congress MPs have alluded to the role of the Enforcement Directorate and other government agencies in the matter. 

The state Congress now has a list of leaders whose departures they have to explain: Bhupen Borah's departure from the party on February 22, the defection of three MLAs from the Congress to the BJP on March 5, the switch of former Assam Congress Working President Rana Goswami to the BJP, the exit of former Assam Youth Congress President Ankita Das and Joint General Secretary Parba Das Kalita. 

The continuous and systematic departures, most leaders agree off the record, have progressively weakened the party. The current dispensation, though, maintains that the party, which currently has 29 MLAs in the 126-member House, will put up a strong fight in the election.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/xedfg9c

China, Pak Developing Nuclear Missiles That Put US Within Range: Intel Chief

US Intelligence Chief Tulsi Gabbard, presenting the intelligence community's 2026 Annual Threat Assessment, said that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and Pakistan are the most significant nuclear threats to the United States. 

While testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Wednesday, Gabbard said, "The intelligence community assesses that Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, and Pakistan have been researching and developing an array of novel, advanced, or traditional missile delivery systems, with nuclear and conventional payloads, that put our homeland within range."

Gabbard said that China and Russia are developing advanced delivery systems that are capable of penetrating or bypassing US missile defences. 

"North Korea's ICBMs can already reach US soil, and it is committed to expanding its nuclear arsenal," she added.

The intel chief highlighted that North Korea is deepening its ties with Russia and China, a shifting alignment she suggested carries serious implications for global security.

Speaking about Pakistan, she told lawmakers that the Islamic republic's long-range ballistic missile development potentially could include ICBMs with the range capable of striking the United States.

Gabbard identified Al-Qaeda and ISIS as significant and enduring threats to US interests abroad, with both groups maintaining a dangerous presence across parts of Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia.

She claimed that the expected number of missiles capable of striking the United States has increased sharply from 3,000 in 2025 to 16,000 in 2035.

Gabbard Contradicts Trump

On the situation in Iran, Gabbard contradicted US President Donald Trump and said that Iran made no effort to rebuild uranium enrichment after its capabilities were destroyed in a June 2025 US-Israeli attack.

"As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran's nuclear enrichment programme was obliterated. There has been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability," Gabbard said in prepared testimony to the Senate.

Ahead of the hearing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News that Trump had full confidence in Gabbard.

Gabbard's testimony comes after former top aide Joseph Kent resigned as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center over the Iran war.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/mdBWC6O

SKY Apologised To NZ Star, Told Arshdeep This After T20 WC Final Clash

India's T20 skipper Suryakumar Yadav has revealed that he personally apologised to New Zealand's Daryl Mitchell after he was hit by an Arshdeep Singh throw during the recent World Cup final as he wanted to set an example of good leadership. Arshdeep was fined 15 per cent of his match fee and handed a demerit point by the ICC for throwing the ball that hit Mitchell on his pads. The pacer did not immediately apologise which prompted Mitchell to confront him, leading to an intervention by Suryakumar and the on-field umpires.

Arshdeep eventually issued a public apology and the two players shook hands at the end of the match that India won by 96 runs to retain the trophy.

Asked about the aggression on display in that moment during a podcast interview with PTI Videos, Suryakumar made light of the incident.

"Heat of the moment mein kabhi kabhi ho jaata hai (It happens in the heat of the moment sometimes). At that time you don't fully understand what is happening. But later, I told paaji, that this is not how it happens. He then spoke to Mitchell and it was a light moment," the skipper said.

"He took it in his stride. But it was very important for me to go and tell Daryl Mitchell myself, because as a leader, what example you set on the ground, that is also also very important.

"So I went and told him (Mitchell) the same thing, if Arshdeep did it deliberately, then I am sorry. And even if he did not do it deliberately, I am sorry," he revealed.

Arshdeep's public apology came soon after the match during a post-match interview with the broadcaster.

"Just want to apologise to Mitchell. My throw reverse-swung and hit him so just wanted to say sorry to him for that. It was not intentional," he had said. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/sj7AvBz

Israel Claims Killing Of Iran's Wartime 'Khamenei'. Who Was Ali Larijani?

Israel said Tuesday it had killed Iran security boss Ali Larjiani, a senior politician and Revolutionary Guards Corp veteran, and the country's de facto wartime chief following the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei in a US-Israel air strike on his central Tehran compound.

Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said Larijani had been "eliminated last night".

Iran has not confirmed this. But, if true, it will be the biggest blow to the country since Khamenei's death, and underlines the capacity of Israeli intelligence and American air superiority in this war.

Larijani, 67, has been described as a 'true insider', a trusted and loyal lieutenant of the former Ayatollah and adept at balancing ideology with pragmatism, the soldier-to-diplomat transition underlined by Khamenei sending him to Oman and Qatar to hold talks with the United States.

In August last year he was appointed as Secretary of Supreme National Security Council; this was in the aftermath of the 12-Day War, i.e., US-Israel air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

But Larijani's heft reached much further back; months earlier (and with some prescience) Khamenei entrusted him with drafting a strategy to survive decapitation strikes. The remit, senior IRGC officials told The New York Times, was 'to ensure the Islamic Republic survives not only American and Israeli bombs, but also any assassination attempt on its leadership'.

When death came for Khamenei, he executed the playbook.

After Khamenei, the rise

And Ali Larijani, already one of the regime's most powerful figures, became even more so, eclipsing the Ayatollah's successor – his son Mojtaba Khamenei – in visibility.

Hours into the war, with Tomahawk missiles and F-35 fighter jets hammering 'hidden' nuclear sites, IRGC bases, and capital Tehran, Larijani then appeared on national television.

The Americans and the Zionists had "burned the heart of the Iranian people", he said, "… and we will burn their hearts. They should know it's not like they can strike and leave…"

More statements and public appearances followed, Larijani's role as Iran's visible war leadership settling any nerves hit by the Ayatollah's death, even as his son shunned the spotlight. He was seen in public in Tehran for the annual Quds Day rally.

The wartime role

His position as the SNSC chief and IRGC military experience meant the bespectacled Larijani emerged as the focal point of war-time planning, coordinating ballistic missile deployments along the Gulf coast and overseeing the defence of nuclear sites as Defence Council head.

He was also seen as playing a critical role in the hours and days immediately after the Ayatollah's death, simultaneously delivering thunderous warnings to the US and Israelis while working behind the scenes to revive and operationalise the 'mosaic defence' network.

The survival playbook aside, Larijani remained the figure greenlighting missile strikes against American and Israeli military targets and civilian and oil infrastructure at Gulf neighbours.

And regional analysts told The New York Times Iran's chokehold on the Hormuz, a pressure point that has driven global energy supply to the brink of chaos, had been planned by Larijani.

There were even rumours Larijani vetoed the use of cluster munitions against Israel, though in angry statements released last week Tel Aviv claimed such bombs had, in fact, been fired.

Unnamed regime sources said Larijani felt cluster bombs were a red line for the US.

Domestically, Larijani had his eye on civilian protests – building on December-January agitations that caught Trump's eye in the build-up to this war – that could threaten regime continuity.

His attempts to quell the protests – in which thousands of people died, many executed by the regime – led to the US sanctioning him for "violently repressing the Iranian people".

Larijani's diplomatic avatar also fed into Iran's post-Khamenei leadership structure, setting him up as potential peace broker between the Americans and the regime. If nothing else Larijani was a key nuclear off-ramp, a familiar figure with mediators in Qatar and Oman and with the US.

Who was Ali Larijani?

Born in Iraq in 1957 to a prominent Shia cleric close to the Islamic Republic's founder Ayatollah Khomeini, Larijani's family has been influential within Iran's political system for decades.

He earned a doctorate in Western Philosophy from the University of Tehran and served with the IRGC during the Iran-Iraq war and as Speaker of the Parliament from 2008 to 2020.

In-between he also contested the 2005 presidential election, losing eventually to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, with whom he later had disagreements over Iran's nuclear programme. Larijani, in fact, had supported the 2015 nuclear deal with the West from which Trump withdrew.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/eBPsAbU

Dhoni Had A 'Shisha Man' In His Hotel Room During IPL. Ex-CSK Star Reveals

Veteran England wicket-keeper batter Sam Billings, who used to play for Chennai Super Kings (CSK) in the Indian Premier League (IPL), has confirmed that legendary captain MS Dhoni would often indulge in shisha. Reflecting on his memories from the CSK dressing room between 2018 and 2019, Billings revealed that Dhoni would even appoint a "shisha man" to look after it. Describing Dhoni as a "cool" person, Billings also said that the former captain would usually keep his hotel room open.

"He (Dhoni) leaves his hotel room open, and he has this little "shisha man" in his entourage who looks after the shisha. His sole job is to look after the shisha. Khaleel," revealed Billings, speaking on the Stick to Cricket podcast.

This isn't the first instance of a player saying that Dhoni indulges in shisha. Earlier, former India cricketers Irfan Pathan and Manoj Tiwary had also hinted the same.

Billings also opened up on the stardom surrounding Dhoni, saying that the latter would rarely be able to leave the hotel.

In another fun anecdote, he revealed that Dhoni is a Manchester United fan, and the two would often watch football matches together.

"What a lovely guy, considering how much stardom he has. He's a superstar. Obviously, a Manchester United fan, like myself. We've watched quite a few games together because he can't leave the hotel or go downstairs to the bar," Billings said.

"I think just in terms of his captaincy, his aura, it's fantastic. He's incredibly calm and genuinely cool. There aren't many cool people. You don't meet many cool people these days. But he is," the Englishman added.

Billings and Dhoni played together at CSK in 2018 and 2019. CSK won the title under Dhoni's captaincy in 2018 and then reached the final the following year.

Despite being 44 years old, Dhoni will be entering his 17th IPL season with CSK in 2026. He even led the franchise in the second half of IPL 2025 after an injury to regular captain Ruturaj Gaikwad.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/LJ7zuHs

Induction Cooking vs Infrared: What Is Similar, What Is Different

If you have been thinking about adding an electric cooktop to your kitchen, you have probably already run into the induction versus infrared question. Both sit behind a flat glass surface, both run on electricity, and both look almost identical on a kitchen counter. But they work in completely different ways, and for Indian cooking specifically (everything from a high-heat tadka to a slow-cooked dal, a deep-fry in a kadhai to a Phulka on a tawa), the differences matter a lot more than they would for a kitchen that mostly does pasta and scrambled eggs. Here is a proper breakdown of what each cooktop actually does, how it handles the demands of Indian cooking, and which one makes more sense for your home.

How They Work: The Fundamental Difference

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

This is the part most people skip, but it explains everything else.

An induction cooktop does not generate heat in the cooktop surface itself. Instead, it uses electromagnetic energy to generate heat directly inside the base of the cookware. There is a copper coil beneath the glass surface that creates a magnetic field, and when a pot or pan with a magnetic (ferrous) base is placed on it, that magnetic field induces an electrical current in the metal, which produces heat. The cooktop surface itself stays largely cool. It only warms up from the residual heat transferred back from the hot pan. This is why induction is so energy-efficient: almost none of the energy is wasted heating air or the surrounding surface.

An infrared cooktop, on the other hand, works by heating the glass surface itself using a halogen lamp or a heating element underneath it, which then radiates heat upward into whatever vessel you place on top. It is closer in principle to a traditional electric coil stove, except that the heat is delivered more evenly and more efficiently. The surface gets hot, the vessel placed on it gets hot, and the food cooks. Simple and familiar.

The practical implication of this difference is enormous: induction only works with magnetic cookware, while infrared works with virtually any cookware that has a flat bottom.

The Cookware Question: The Biggest Practical Difference For Indian Kitchens

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Photo Credit: Pexels

This is where most people make their buying decision, and it is the right place to focus.

For induction, the rule is firm: the vessel must have a magnetic base. The easiest test is a simple fridge magnet. Hold it to the bottom of your pan. If it sticks firmly, the vessel will work on induction. If it does not stick, it will not work at all. Induction-compatible materials include cast iron, carbon steel, enamelled iron, and stainless steel with a magnetic base. Most stainless steel pressure cookers and many newer stainless steel tawas and kadahis are induction-compatible.

What does not work on induction: plain aluminium, copper, glass, ceramic, and non-magnetic stainless steel. And here is the problem. The Indian kitchen is full of aluminium. The classic thin aluminium pressure cooker, the aluminium vessels that have been in the family for decades, the lightweight aluminium kadhai. None of these will work on an induction stove unless they have been specifically fitted with an induction-compatible base. For many households, switching to induction means buying a significant amount of new cookware, which adds to the upfront cost.

Infrared is considerably more forgiving. Because it heats the surface and the vessel receives that heat by contact, it can work with aluminium, glass, ceramic, and most flat-bottomed vessels. There is no magnetic requirement. If you have a wide range of existing cookware that you would like to continue using, infrared does not force your hand.

There is, however, one shared limitation that catches many Indian cooks off guard: both induction and infrared work best with flat-bottomed vessels. The traditional kadhai with its rounded base is genuinely problematic on both. On induction, a rounded-base kadhai will not be detected by the cooktop's sensor and the hob simply will not activate. On infrared, it will heat, but unevenly, because the curved base does not sit flush against the glass surface. For everyday deep-frying, the solution is the same on both platforms: use a heavy flat-bottom kadhai, or a wok-style vessel with a flat base.

Cooking Performance: Speed, Heat Control, And Indian Techniques

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Speed and heat-up time: Induction heats up significantly faster than infrared because it generates heat directly in the cookware rather than heating through an intermediate surface. For tasks like bringing a pressure cooker up to full pressure, boiling water for rice, or getting oil to the right temperature for a tadka, induction is noticeably quicker.

Temperature control: Induction offers much finer temperature control. The electromagnetic field can be adjusted almost instantaneously, so dropping from a high sauté to a low simmer happens immediately and accurately. This is a real advantage for Indian cooking, where the difference between a perfectly done bhuna masala and a burnt one can be a matter of seconds. Infrared responds more slowly and retains heat in the surface for some time after the setting is reduced, which can make precise control harder.

Even heating: Infrared has a slight edge here. Because it heats the entire base of the vessel through radiant contact, the heat distribution tends to be more even across the bottom of the pan. Induction heats the centre of the base more intensely, which can occasionally create hot spots in certain types of cookware.

The tadka question: Both handle a quick tadka well enough, though induction's faster heat-up time and finer control give it an advantage when you need the oil to hit a specific temperature quickly, or need to drop the heat immediately after the mustard seeds splutter.

Phulkas and rotis: Neither platform replicates the direct flame of a gas stove, which is what allows a phulka to puff up fully. On both induction and infrared, rotis can be made on a tawa and will cook well, but the final puffing stage (where you would normally move the roti directly onto the flame) requires a workaround. A thick iron or steel tawa, pressed down gently on the roti, can help. Some cooks use a small wire mesh rack placed on the heating zone for the final puff. It takes some practice, but it is doable.

Baingan bharta and smoky dishes: This is the one technique that neither an electric cooktop can replicate. The smoky, charred flavour of a brinjal roasted over a gas flame is essentially impossible to achieve on induction or infrared. If baingan bharta is a weekly staple in your home, you will either need to finish on an oven grill, use an air fryer, or use the dhungar technique (placing a small piece of burning charcoal in the finished dish under a cover) to add smokiness.

Energy Efficiency, Safety, and Cost Considerations

Latest and Breaking News on NDTV

Photo Credit: Pexels

Induction cooktops excel in energy efficiency, transferring up to 90% of generated energy directly into cookware, minimising ambient heat waste. In contrast, infrared cooktops, while more efficient than traditional electric coil stoves, still lose energy to the heated glass surface and surrounding area. Over time, these energy savings can significantly reduce electricity bills. 

Safety is another area where induction shines, especially in households with young children or elderly members. The cooktop surface remains cool, reducing the risk of burns, unlike infrared surfaces that stay hot even after being turned off. Induction cooktops often include safety features such as child locks, auto shut-off, and overheat protection. Both induction and infrared are safer than gas stoves, which pose risks of gas leaks, carbon monoxide, and open flames. 

Regarding cost, infrared cooktops are generally more affordable upfront, with entry-level models in India starting at ₹1,500 to ₹2,500, compared to induction models starting at ₹2,000 to ₹3,500. However, if switching to induction requires purchasing new cookware, the initial cost increases. Despite this, induction's long-term energy efficiency can offset the higher upfront expense, with potential monthly electricity savings accumulating over a year or two, making it a cost-effective choice for daily family cooking.

Which One Should You Buy?

Choose induction if you do most of your cooking in stainless steel or cast iron, you have or are willing to invest in induction-compatible cookware, you prioritise speed and precise temperature control, and safety is a priority in your household.

Choose infrared if you have a wide range of existing cookware that you would like to keep using (including aluminium), you are on a tighter budget, or you prefer a simpler, more familiar cooking experience that does not require checking whether your vessels are compatible.

There is no universally correct answer here, and that is actually reassuring. Both options are genuine improvements over older electric alternatives, and either will serve an Indian kitchen well once you understand the requirements. The honest truth is that most experienced Indian home cooks who have made the switch to induction end up preferring it after the initial adjustment period, largely because of the speed and the fine control. But infrared remains a practical, flexible choice, particularly for kitchens that run on a diverse mix of cookware accumulated over years of cooking. Know your own kitchen before you decide.



from NDTV News- Special https://ift.tt/s7lSPcO